Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/62132
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSareena Mhadmhan-
dc.contributor.authorPaweesuda Natewong-
dc.contributor.authorPrasert Reubroycharoen-
dc.contributor.authorChulalongkorn University. Center of Excellence on Petrochemical and Materials Technology-
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn University. Faculty of Science-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-17T09:10:02Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-17T09:10:02Z-
dc.date.issued2018-08-
dc.identifier.citationCatalysts, Volume 8, Issue 8 (August 2018),18 pagesen_US
dc.identifier.issn2073-4344-
dc.identifier.urihttp://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/62132-
dc.description.abstractNi/SiO2 (Ni/SF) catalysts were prepared by electrospinning of the SF followed by impregnation. The performance of the Ni/SF catalysts for hydrogen production from ethanol steam reforming at various conditions was investigated in comparison with a conventional Ni/silica porous (Ni/SP) catalyst. The influence of the Ni/SF catalyst preparation methods on the catalytic activity and stability in ethanol steam reforming was also studied. The catalysts were prepared by three different preparation techniques: impregnation (IM), deposition precipitation (DP) and strong electrostatic adsorption (SEA). The Ni/SF catalyst exhibited higher performances and stability than the Ni/SP catalyst. The H2 yields of 55% and 47% were achieved at 600 °C using the Ni/SF and Ni/SP catalysts, respectively. The preparation methods had a significant effect on the catalytic activity and stability of the Ni/SF catalyst, where that prepared by the SEA method had a smaller Ni particle size and higher dispersion, and also exhibited the highest catalytic activity and stability compared to the Ni/SF catalysts prepared by IM and DP methods. The maximum H2 yield produced from the catalyst prepared by SEA was 65%, while that from the catalysts prepared by DP and IM were 60% and 55%, respectively, under the same conditions. The activity of the fiber catalysts prepared by SEA, DP and IM remained almost constant at all times during a 16 h stability test.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/catal8080319-
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/8/8/319-
dc.rights© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.en_US
dc.titleInvestigation of Ni/SiO2 Fiber Catalysts Prepared by Different Methods on Hydrogen production from Ethanol Steam Reformingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.email.authorPrasert.R@Chula.ac.th-
dc.subject.keywordNi-based catalysten_US
dc.subject.keywordpreparation methoden_US
dc.subject.keywordsilica fiberen_US
dc.subject.keywordethanol steam reformingen_US
dc.subject.keywordhydrogen productionen_US
dc.identifier.DOI10.3390/catal8080319-
Appears in Collections:Foreign Journal Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
html_submission_64955.html2.74 kBHTMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.