Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/62135
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNijasri C. Suwanwela-
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn University.Chulalongkorn Stroke Centre-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-17T09:40:52Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-17T09:40:52Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationCerebrovascular Diseases, Vol.46 , No.(1-2) (2018), p. 82-88.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1015-9770-
dc.identifier.urihttp://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/62135-
dc.description.abstractMLC601 has been shown in preclinical studies to enhance neurorestorative mechanisms after stroke. The aim of this post hoc analysis was to assess whether combining MLC601 and rehabilitation has an effect on improving functional outcomes after stroke. Methods: Data from the CHInese Medicine NeuroAiD Efficacy on Stroke (CHIMES) and CHIMES-Extension (CHIMES-E) studies were analyzed. CHIMES-E was a 24-month follow-up study of subjects included in CHIMES, a multi-centre, double-blind placebo-controlled trial which randomized subjects with acute ischemic stroke, to either MLC601 or placebo for 3 months in addition to standard stroke treatment and rehabilitation. Subjects were stratified according to whether they received or did not receive persistent rehabilitation up to month (M)3 (non- randomized allocation) and by treatment group. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Barthel Index were assessed at month (M) 3, M6, M12, M18, and M24. Results: Of 880 subjects in CHIMES-E, data on rehabilitation at M3 were available in 807 (91.7%, mean age 61.8 ± 11.3 years, 36% female). After adjusting for prognostic factors of poor outcome (age, sex, pre-stroke mRS, baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, and stroke onset-to-study-treatment time), subjects who received persistent rehabilitation showed consistently higher treatment effect in favor of MLC601 for all time points on mRS 0–1 dichotomy analysis (ORs 1.85 at M3, 2.18 at M6, 2.42 at M12, 1.94 at M18, 1.87 at M24), mRS ordinal analysis (ORs 1.37 at M3, 1.40 at M6, 1.53 at M12, 1.50 at M18, 1.38 at M24), and BI ≥95 dichotomy analysis (ORs 1.39 at M3, 1.95 at M6, 1.56 at M12, 1.56 at M18, 1.46 at M24) compared to those who did not receive persistent rehabilitation. Conclusions: More subjects on MLC601 improved to functional independence compared to placebo among subjects receiving persistent rehabilitation up to M3. The larger treatment effect of MLC601 was sustained over 2 years which supports the hypothesis that MLC601 combined with rehabilitation might have beneficial and sustained effects on neuro-repair processes after stroke. There is a need for more data on the effect of combining rehabilitation programs with stroke recovery treatments.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherS. Karger AGen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/492625-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000492625-
dc.rights© 2018 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Baselen_US
dc.titleEffect of Combined Treatment with MLC601 (NeuroAiDTM) and Rehabilitation on Post-Stroke Recovery: The CHIMES and CHIMES-E Studiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.keywordAcute strokeen_US
dc.subject.keywordStroke recoveryen_US
dc.subject.keywordMLC601en_US
dc.subject.keywordNeuroAiDen_US
dc.subject.keywordRehabilitationen_US
dc.subject.keywordCombinationen_US
dc.subject.keywordClinical trialen_US
dc.subject.keywordLong-term outcomeen_US
dc.identifier.DOI10.1159/000492625-
Appears in Collections:Foreign Journal Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
html_submission_64957.html2.76 kBHTMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.