DSpace Repository

Factors related to hypertensive phase after glaucoma drainage device implantation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Orathai Pitukcheewanont
dc.contributor.author Visanee Tantisevi
dc.contributor.author Sunee Chansangpetch
dc.contributor.author Prin Rojanapongpun
dc.date.accessioned 2019-06-27T06:22:09Z
dc.date.available 2019-06-27T06:22:09Z
dc.date.issued 2018-08-17
dc.identifier.citation Clinical Ophthalmology. vol.12 (2018), p.1479-1486 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1177-5483
dc.identifier.uri http://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/62289
dc.description.abstract Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate factors related to hypertensive phase (HP) after glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation. Patients and methods: Retrospective charts review of glaucoma patients who underwent GDD implantation and completed 12 months of follow-up at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital since 2004 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of HP. The data were analyzed for factors associated with HP. The surgical outcomes including surgical failure, post-operative visual acuity (VA), post-operative number of medications, post-operative intraocular pressure (IOP), and post-operative complication were compared between the two groups. Results: Seventy-two patients were included. Most were diagnosed with secondary glaucoma (N=51, 70.8%), and Baerveldt was the most implanted GDD (N=49, 68.1%). Mean ± SD of IOP was significantly lower: 27.1±9.6 mmHg at pre-operation and 13.7±59 mmHg at 12-month follow-up (p<0.001). HP was identified in 38/72 patients (52.8%, 95% CI 40.7–64.7). Risk factor of HP was pre-operative VA equal or better than 20/70 (p=0.021, OR 7.5; 95% CI 1.4–41.4). Presence of underlying heart disease (patients in this group had taken anti-platelets) was found as a protective factor for HP (p=0.027, OR 0.06; 95% CI 0.00–0.72). It was speculated that the anti-inflammatory effect of the anti-platelets, particularly aspirin, may be responsible for controlling inflammation and retarding fibrosis formation around drainage implants. Failure rate at 12 months was 24/72 (33%). There was no difference in all surgical outcomes between the two groups. Survival analysis also showed no significant difference between HP and non-HP group. Conclusion: HP commonly occurred after GDD implantation. Pre-operative VA was a risk factor for the development of HP, whereas presence of underlying heart disease was a protective factor. No association between HP and surgical outcomes was identified. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Dove Medical Press en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S166244
dc.relation.uri https://www.dovepress.com/factors-related-to-hypertensive-phase-after-glaucoma-drainage-device-i-peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
dc.rights © 2018 Pitukcheewanont et al. en_US
dc.title Factors related to hypertensive phase after glaucoma drainage device implantation en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.email.author No information provided
dc.email.author Visanee.T@Chula.ac.th
dc.email.author No information provided
dc.email.author Prin.R@Chula.ac.th
dc.subject.keyword glaucoma implant en_US
dc.subject.keyword post-operative intraocular pressure en_US
dc.subject.keyword risk factors en_US
dc.subject.keyword surgical outcomes en_US
dc.identifier.DOI 10.2147/OPTH.S166244


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Foreign Journal Article [121]
    บทความวารสารภาษาต่างประเทศจากฐานข้อมูลออนไลน์ Free Open Access

Show simple item record