Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/71902
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorManisri Puntularp-
dc.contributor.advisorPirom Kamol-ratanakul-
dc.contributor.authorSan San Aye-
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn University. Graduate School-
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-23T02:01:21Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-23T02:01:21Z-
dc.date.issued1996-
dc.identifier.isbn9746367129-
dc.identifier.urihttp://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/71902-
dc.descriptionThesis (M.Sc.)--Chulalongkorn University, 1996en_US
dc.description.abstractThe current problem in the Leprosy Control Program is low coverage of registered cases which is roughly estimated to be about 50% of the total estimated cases in the country. There is a need for intensification of case finding activities in the implementation of the Leprosy Control Program. The major objective of this study is to assess the costs and benefits of different methods of case finding activities : Active Case Detection and Passive Case Detection, from the provider as well as patient perspectives. In this study benefits in terms of cost savings for early case detection were used to find out which method of case finding activities is better in the sense that more early cases are detected. If the patients are detected in the early stage that is before disability sets in, there will be substantial cost savings from provider as well as patient sides. The benefit/cost ratios are found out from three different scenarios : Baseline scenario, ACD alone scenario and PCD alone scenario in low, median and high endemic areas of the country. The study shows that from the provider perspective, ACD alone scenario had the highest benefit/cost ratio among the three scenarios. In the low endemic areas the benefit/cost ratio for ACD alone scenario is 1.33 and the value in PCD alone scenario is 1.25 but in high endemic areas these values vary too much: 10.38 and 1.37, respectively. It means that in the high endemic areas ACD activity should be more emphasized than PCD activity in terms of the early case detection. From the patient perspective, in the low endemic areas benefit/cost ratio for ACD is 34.86 but in the high endemic areas benefit/cost ratio for ACD is 76.99 which is very much larger than PCD. The study concludes that ACD activities are more emphasized than PCD activities especially in the high endemic areas. By doing economic evaluation, the program can identify which method of case finding activities should be given more priority in different endemic areas of the country in terms of analyzing the costs for each method of case finding activities and cost savings for early case detection which is acting as benefit of the studyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.rightsChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.subjectLeprosy Control Program -- Myanmar -- Cost effectivenessen_US
dc.subjectCost effectivenessen_US
dc.titleCost-benefit analysis of case finding activities : a case of Leprosy Control Program in Myanmaren_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.degree.nameMaster of Economicsen_US
dc.degree.levelMaster's Degreeen_US
dc.degree.disciplineEconomicsen_US
dc.degree.grantorChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.email.advisorManisri.P@Chula.ac.th-
dc.email.advisorPirom.K@Chula.ac.th-
Appears in Collections:Grad - Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
San san_ay_front_p.pdf879.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
San san_ay_ch1_p.pdf960.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
San san_ay_ch2_p.pdf987.13 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
San san_ay_ch3_p.pdf918.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
San san_ay_ch4_p.pdf1.48 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
San san_ay_ch5_p.pdf928.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
San san_ay_ch6_p.pdf795.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
San san_ay_back_p.pdf1.57 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.